was not enough to cancel the direct preferences from our electoral system. It is not enough to remove the Italians sacred right to choose their candidate to be sent to Parliament. No, not enough. Silvio Berlusconi now wants to abolish the preference, even at the European Parliament: "I want us to go to Europe and that highly qualified people in all the twenty-three committees there are professionals in each field. We only choose those who go to list we will be sure to have a representation capable of defending the interests of Italians. " For we have seen what they did in Italy these “professionisti…capaci di difendere gli interessi italiani”. I vari Ghedini, Pecorella e gli altri berluscloni sono stati nominati parlamentari nell’interesse degli italiani vero? Io sapevo che sono avvocati personali del Cavaliere e quindi si occupano degli interessi si di qualcuno, ma non di certo degli italiani. Inoltre è stato proposto anche uno sbarramento del 5% che taglierà fuori i partiti minori (viene da pensare che si voglia escludere l’Italia dei Valori, che ha poco più del 4%). Mentre il Partito Democratico è d’accordo con lo sbarramento, ma solo del 4%. In questa “democraticissima” Italia è passato oggi a colpi di maggioranza il decreto Gelmini, che ridurrà dramatically the funding for public schools and universities particularly in the already debilitated. The researchers already are forced to beg for lack of funds reagents discarded by hospitals, let alone over the next few years. Moreover, it seems, short of private capital should enter the University of banks and enterprises, as the universities themselves can not stand. But can you imagine the bank Unicredit, which will decide on the colleges and universities?! The consequences would be catastrophic. In the words of Aldo Giannullo Blog Grillo, privatization would result in the cancellation of many courses deemed unnecessary by the lender companies: foreign literature, some of the courses in economics and law etc ... Giannullo also adds that: "We would have a number of scientific and technological application immediately all projected non-pure research, and training would be cut out strictly on the needs of companies involved in the consortium. With the result to produce engineers who know all about that particular company, that if we lose their jobs will never find another because they do not know how to do anything else. " A pretty picture in short.
The funny thing, or tragic, is that it speaks of the fact whether it is acceptable or not Gelmini reform (which has nothing to reform) and no one calls into question a cornerstone of the matter: The decree was proposed and approved in haste and fury because the government deems it necessary to reform the school, but he knows that she needs money to cover the debts of Alitalia, which we happily landed with the company to leave the healthy part of the crafty Cai (& Crollaninno Co). There has been reckless financial operations in recent years, as the lush and totally out of place tax cuts and the maneuver-Cai Alitalia, which now leaves us with the water in the throat. The school can not be ravaged to raise money. The Government could recover quite a bit 'of capital city worthy of combat duty in tax evasion (300miliardi euro of tax evasion each year), as Prodi had done that in part was managed to recover 18 billion euro. Mica peanuts.
But the "nano ridens" can not. Can not do that because in his party, among his friends, contractors in your company, there are people convicted of tax evasion, false accounting, etc. ... It would do him an injustice too big. Well, then nothing fight against tax evasion. There 's another way to recover a tidy sum: to fight the Mafia and confiscate property. But even here there are a few 'problems. 1) E 'demanding and risky. The idea of \u200b\u200bsweating it shakes our politicians. 2) Berlusconi, according to the court of Palermo, in the hands of the Cosa Nostra '74 because of Marcello Dell'Utri, founder Forza Italy and current senator of the PDL. 3) sit in the ranks of the majority of sentenced persons, investigated or suspected of mafia crimes. So even this hypothesis is to be discarded ...
See? There 'are those who say that the tumultuous history and convictions of politicians not to disrupt their performance and that this has nothing to do with the fact that the Italians can not get to the end of the month. Now it is shown that the inclination of politicians to commit a crime has to do all right with the problems that plague us every day.
Could it be that by chance, I say by chance, we must make a sneaky that prohibits convicted criminals to hold public office?
