Sunday, September 28, 2008

Mooie Denise Milani Foto S

watchdogs

For those who still believe that the media can not influence people's minds, expose below a small example: How come when someone says that the founder of a party to the case (Forza Italy) was sentenced in first instance for collusion with the Mafia, people do not make a turn, and when he is told a guy who smokes pipes are shocked and organize debates on the spot? I saw grown men and women, even high school teachers, remain impassive while we talk about bank seigniorage or convicted mafia Giulio Andreotti (who naturally believed acquitted). And I've seen them get angry and bring the collections to save stray dogs on the highway. For goodness sake, there 'nothing wrong if someone agrees to take care of "our four-legged friends" (as they called Open Studio), but if this gesture is not accompanied by an interest in the human race is likely to appear selfish. The dogs and the victims of the Thyssen Krupp no. Why? It is now a real degeneration and this degeneration can be found in the responses to our questions give the degenerate. I experienced first hand an example:
(degenerate is the first teacher of letters, the second is a student)
degenerated: "Yesterday I saw a news service to the [Open Studio bet!, Author's note] was talking about a dog who needs an operation on her leg. How about doing a collection together? "
I:" But how? A few weeks ago there was need to pay 1 euro per person to complete the construction of a school in Rwanda and did not say anything, but now organized a collection for a dog? "
degenerate" You have to learn that sometimes the dogs are much better for people "degenerate
classmate:" How heavy! "Heavy
I? If weight only 68 pounds! Jokes aside, the answer given by the teacher is really horrible, at first I had noticed the seriousness of his statement but now I realize that I should go into hiding. What the hell happened? How can you say such things? Why we hate and we prefer to help the puppies rather than the malnourished children in the Third World? Mystery. I leave to you the thoughts and reflections ... Joke! Obviously I do. It gives more importance to animals injured victims in the workplace and the injured in Iraq perché i mezzi di comunicazione, tv in testa, danno più risalto alle storie dei cani abbandonati piuttosto che alle sventure dei clandestini e delle persone che hanno perso la famiglia a causa dei bombardamenti. I tg amano parlare della nascita di un cucciolo di panda in uno zoo e scansano, con grande abilità bisogna ammettere, gli argomenti scomodi. Scomodi per chi? Per i padroni dell’informazione: Il governo e i partiti, la confindustria, le banche. Adesso Berlusconi controlla Mediaset, che è di sua di proprietà, la Rai dato che il consiglio di amministrazione è eletto dal Parlamento, e 20 giornali (Panorama, Il Giornale, Il Foglio..). Perciò possiede il 95% dei mezzi di comunicazione italiani. Di cosa volete who speak their news? Mafia? Of convicts in Parliament? Accident at work? Uncertainty of the penalty? And of all the other problems of the country? No, facial tissues, gossip, murder ... and dogs. It only talks about things that are not uncomfortable against the power, and emotional issues are among these. That's why the news, and consequently the majority of Italians (shaped as desired by the mass media), are sensitive to gossip, to the crime and to the dogs, and ignore, for various reasons, the arguments that have real impact on our lives. Now no longer need to lie, they talk about dogs and they all forget we are in that situation. The dogs, in spite of themselves, have become a kind of "watchdogs" in the service of power, have climbed even journalists. If there are other, lies, scandals and shame disappear from the TV screen as if by magic.
If things remain this way the truth will remain hidden saeculorum saecula. Amen.

Mooie Denise Milani Foto S

watchdogs

For those who still believe that the media can not influence people's minds, expose below a small example: How come when someone says that the founder of a party to the case (Forza Italy) was sentenced in first instance for collusion with the Mafia, people do not make a turn, and when he is told a guy who smokes pipes are shocked and organize debates on the spot? I saw grown men and women, even high school teachers, remain impassive while we talk about bank seigniorage or convicted mafia Giulio Andreotti (who naturally believed acquitted). And I've seen them get angry and bring the collections to save stray dogs on the highway. For goodness sake, there 'nothing wrong if someone agrees to take care of "our four-legged friends" (as they called Open Studio), but if this gesture is not accompanied by an interest in the human race is likely to appear selfish. The dogs and the victims of the Thyssen Krupp no. Why? It is now a real degeneration and this degeneration can be found in the responses to our questions give the degenerate. I experienced first hand an example:
(degenerate is the first teacher of letters, the second is a student)
degenerated: "Yesterday I saw a news service to the [Open Studio bet!, Author's note] was talking about a dog who needs an operation on her leg. How about doing a collection together? "
I:" But how? A few weeks ago there was need to pay 1 euro per person to complete the construction of a school in Rwanda and did not say anything, but now organized a collection for a dog? "
degenerate" You have to learn that sometimes the dogs are much better for people "degenerate
classmate:" How heavy! "Heavy
I? If weight only 68 pounds! Jokes aside, the answer given by the teacher is really horrible, at first I had noticed the seriousness of his statement but now I realize that I should go into hiding. What the hell happened? How can you say such things? Why we hate and we prefer to help the puppies rather than the malnourished children in the Third World? Mystery. I leave to you the thoughts and reflections ... Joke! Obviously I do. It gives more importance to animals injured victims in the workplace and the injured in Iraq perché i mezzi di comunicazione, tv in testa, danno più risalto alle storie dei cani abbandonati piuttosto che alle sventure dei clandestini e delle persone che hanno perso la famiglia a causa dei bombardamenti. I tg amano parlare della nascita di un cucciolo di panda in uno zoo e scansano, con grande abilità bisogna ammettere, gli argomenti scomodi. Scomodi per chi? Per i padroni dell’informazione: Il governo e i partiti, la confindustria, le banche. Adesso Berlusconi controlla Mediaset, che è di sua di proprietà, la Rai dato che il consiglio di amministrazione è eletto dal Parlamento, e 20 giornali (Panorama, Il Giornale, Il Foglio..). Perciò possiede il 95% dei mezzi di comunicazione italiani. Di cosa volete who speak their news? Mafia? Of convicts in Parliament? Accident at work? Uncertainty of the penalty? And of all the other problems of the country? No, facial tissues, gossip, murder ... and dogs. It only talks about things that are not uncomfortable against the power, and emotional issues are among these. That's why the news, and consequently the majority of Italians (shaped as desired by the mass media), are sensitive to gossip, to the crime and to the dogs, and ignore, for various reasons, the arguments that have real impact on our lives. Now no longer need to lie, they talk about dogs and they all forget we are in that situation. The dogs, in spite of themselves, have become a kind of "watchdogs" in the service of power, have climbed even journalists. If there are other, lies, scandals and shame disappear from the TV screen as if by magic.
If things remain this way the truth will remain hidden saeculorum saecula. Amen.

Friday, September 26, 2008

Nose Bleed,plegm Bleed

bank seigniorage seigniorage

The Illuminati

Now that we have seen what they can do and why of their actions, we need to understand how and when they organize to develop plans that will lead to the establishment of a centralized global state, predicted by the writer George Orwell in "1984."
In 1954 it was formalized the establishment of an 'organization designed to meet the focus of many conspiracy theories, which is still today at the Hotel Bilderberg in the Netherlands. The company was named after the hotel where the meeting was the first and so it was christened with the name of the Bilderberg Group.
This group, consisting of representatives of finance and politics, meets about every year and the topics discussed at the meetings are confidential and are not formally recorded. The entire neighborhood where the meeting takes place in the Bilderberg Group, is shielded by security forces and even an investigative journalist in the city came to infiltrate the course of the meeting was arrested just arrived at the airport and held until alla fine del summit. Questo la dice lunga sulla segretezza e sul potere del gruppo.
Il Bilderberg Group è composto da 130 membri fissi più vari ospiti invitati in funzione di semplici relatori. I maggiori sostenitori e promotori furono Bernhard van Lippe-Biesterfeld e Joseph Retinger. Il primo era un ex tesserato del Partito nazista, presidente del WWF fino al 1971 e del Bilderberg Group fino al ’76, aiutò le SS nello spionaggio e la Ig Farben. Dopo la II Guerra Mondiale divenne un petroliere della Shell Oil.
Il secondo, soprannominato “Sua eminenza grigia”, era un economista polacco che auspicava la creazione di un mondo unito sotto il controllo di organizzazioni sovranazionali.
Gli affiliati più importanti sono Bernhard of the Netherlands, Sofia, Etienne Davignon (former European Commissioner), Charles, Juan Carlos of Spain and the usual David Rockefeller. The thing that triggers the minds of supporters of the theory of a plot hatched by the bankers, oilmen and politicians, is the fact that men are invited to meetings of the elements of high finance ministers of the Treasury, publishers and editors of major newspapers world. Some of the distinguished guests present at the summit in recent years are: Gianni and Umberto Agnelli

-Fiat (owners of the third Italian newspaper, La Stampa)
Emma Bonino, Member of the European Commission president
Giampiero Cantoni della Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Innocenzo Cipolletta – direttore generale della Confindustria (proprietaria de “Il Sole 24 Ore” e detentrice di quote di “La Repubblica”)
Cittadini Cesi – diplomatico Usa
Rodolfo De Benedetti – Cir
Ferruccio De Bortoli – Rcs ( proprietaria del primo giornale d’Italia, “Il Corriere della Sera”)
Gianni de Michelis – parlamentare ed ex Ministro degli Affari Esteri (pregiudicato per corruzione)
Mario Draghi – governatore della Banca d’Italia
John Elkann – Fiat e Ifil
Paolo Fresco- presidente Fiat
Tommaso Padoa Schioppa – Ministro dell’economia e delle finanze
Romano Prodi – Presidente del Consiglio
Alessandro Profumo – Credito italiano
Gianni Riotta – direttore Tg1 ed editorialista di “La Stampa”
Carlo Rossella – direttore Studio Aperto
Giulio Tremonti – ex Ministro dell’economia
Marco Tronchetti Provera- Pirelli spa e Telecom
Walter Veltroni – candidato Presidente del Consiglio ed editorialista de “L’Unità”
Josef Ackermann – Deutsche Bank
Max Boot – Wall Street Journal
Phillipe Camus - European Aeronautics Defence and Space
Kenneth Clarke - British American Tobacco
Timothy C. Collins - Yale School of Management, Trilateral Commission
George A. David - Coca-Cola Hellenic Company Botting
Gus De Vries - EU Counter Terrorism Coordinator
Kemal Dervis - World Bank Gr
Timothy F. Geithner - President Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Donald E. Graham - Washington Post Company
Lars Heikenstein - Swedish Central Bank Governor
Allen B. Hubbard - President E & A Industries
Walter Issacson - Aspen Institute president
John Kerr - Director Shell
Arold Underdal - President University of Oslo
Daniel L. Vasella - Novartis AG
Chairman Ben JM Verwaayen - BT
And many more, including perhaps Alcide de Gasperi. It 's absurd to see the giants of the information, politics, industry and finance under one roof protected by a veil of secrecy scary. The Bilderberg group is scary for a simple reason: the system on which it is rooted in the Western world and is tremendously accurate. Rockefeller and the other "Illuminati" discussed and agreed by the Ministers of Economy and Treasury and obey the press hides everything. Very simple, perhaps too much.

Nose Bleed,plegm Bleed

bank seigniorage seigniorage

The Illuminati

Now that we have seen what they can do and why of their actions, we need to understand how and when they organize to develop plans that will lead to the establishment of a centralized global state, predicted by the writer George Orwell in "1984."
In 1954 it was formalized the establishment of an 'organization designed to meet the focus of many conspiracy theories, which is still today at the Hotel Bilderberg in the Netherlands. The company was named after the hotel where the meeting was the first and so it was christened with the name of the Bilderberg Group.
This group, consisting of representatives of finance and politics, meets about every year and the topics discussed at the meetings are confidential and are not formally recorded. The entire neighborhood where the meeting takes place in the Bilderberg Group, is shielded by security forces and even an investigative journalist in the city came to infiltrate the course of the meeting was arrested just arrived at the airport and held until alla fine del summit. Questo la dice lunga sulla segretezza e sul potere del gruppo.
Il Bilderberg Group è composto da 130 membri fissi più vari ospiti invitati in funzione di semplici relatori. I maggiori sostenitori e promotori furono Bernhard van Lippe-Biesterfeld e Joseph Retinger. Il primo era un ex tesserato del Partito nazista, presidente del WWF fino al 1971 e del Bilderberg Group fino al ’76, aiutò le SS nello spionaggio e la Ig Farben. Dopo la II Guerra Mondiale divenne un petroliere della Shell Oil.
Il secondo, soprannominato “Sua eminenza grigia”, era un economista polacco che auspicava la creazione di un mondo unito sotto il controllo di organizzazioni sovranazionali.
Gli affiliati più importanti sono Bernhard of the Netherlands, Sofia, Etienne Davignon (former European Commissioner), Charles, Juan Carlos of Spain and the usual David Rockefeller. The thing that triggers the minds of supporters of the theory of a plot hatched by the bankers, oilmen and politicians, is the fact that men are invited to meetings of the elements of high finance ministers of the Treasury, publishers and editors of major newspapers world. Some of the distinguished guests present at the summit in recent years are: Gianni and Umberto Agnelli

-Fiat (owners of the third Italian newspaper, La Stampa)
Emma Bonino, Member of the European Commission president
Giampiero Cantoni della Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Innocenzo Cipolletta – direttore generale della Confindustria (proprietaria de “Il Sole 24 Ore” e detentrice di quote di “La Repubblica”)
Cittadini Cesi – diplomatico Usa
Rodolfo De Benedetti – Cir
Ferruccio De Bortoli – Rcs ( proprietaria del primo giornale d’Italia, “Il Corriere della Sera”)
Gianni de Michelis – parlamentare ed ex Ministro degli Affari Esteri (pregiudicato per corruzione)
Mario Draghi – governatore della Banca d’Italia
John Elkann – Fiat e Ifil
Paolo Fresco- presidente Fiat
Tommaso Padoa Schioppa – Ministro dell’economia e delle finanze
Romano Prodi – Presidente del Consiglio
Alessandro Profumo – Credito italiano
Gianni Riotta – direttore Tg1 ed editorialista di “La Stampa”
Carlo Rossella – direttore Studio Aperto
Giulio Tremonti – ex Ministro dell’economia
Marco Tronchetti Provera- Pirelli spa e Telecom
Walter Veltroni – candidato Presidente del Consiglio ed editorialista de “L’Unità”
Josef Ackermann – Deutsche Bank
Max Boot – Wall Street Journal
Phillipe Camus - European Aeronautics Defence and Space
Kenneth Clarke - British American Tobacco
Timothy C. Collins - Yale School of Management, Trilateral Commission
George A. David - Coca-Cola Hellenic Company Botting
Gus De Vries - EU Counter Terrorism Coordinator
Kemal Dervis - World Bank Gr
Timothy F. Geithner - President Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Donald E. Graham - Washington Post Company
Lars Heikenstein - Swedish Central Bank Governor
Allen B. Hubbard - President E & A Industries
Walter Issacson - Aspen Institute president
John Kerr - Director Shell
Arold Underdal - President University of Oslo
Daniel L. Vasella - Novartis AG
Chairman Ben JM Verwaayen - BT
And many more, including perhaps Alcide de Gasperi. It 's absurd to see the giants of the information, politics, industry and finance under one roof protected by a veil of secrecy scary. The Bilderberg group is scary for a simple reason: the system on which it is rooted in the Western world and is tremendously accurate. Rockefeller and the other "Illuminati" discussed and agreed by the Ministers of Economy and Treasury and obey the press hides everything. Very simple, perhaps too much.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Awesome Belly Button Tattoos

Part 7 Part 6


Let the Vietnam War. In 1964, two U.S. destroyers were attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin by North Vietnamese ships. For this reason, it triggered the Vietnam War, which dragged on for nearly 30 years. In 1966, President Lyndon Johnson cut off supplies to the Soviet bloc because he knew that the countries of the ball helped the communist North Vietnam. At the same time Rockefeller funded the foundations of Soviet armaments production. While millions of young volunteers risked death, bankers helped their enemies. In 1985 the war continued to rage the U.S. army had to undergo three rules: He could not chase the Viet Cong army across the border with Laos, he could not attack missile batteries without being sure they were in operation, could not take military action without the consent of senior officers. Of course, the Vietnamese armed to the best advantage of these deficits Army Usa. Il motivo dei finanziamenti ai nemici e la creazione e pubblicazione di queste assurde regole, era quello di non vincere e rendere la guerra un conflitto di logoramento, lunghissimo e costoso. In questo modo i banchieri come Rockefeller e Rothschild si arricchirono ulteriormente. Anni dopo, il segretario alla Difesa statunitense ammise che la causa dello scoppio della guerra, l’incidente del Tonchino, fu un errore e che in realtà non ci fu nessun attacco alle navi della marina americana. Di nuovo “problema-reazione-soluzione” e manipolazione delle menti e delle coscienze degli abitanti del mondo.

Awesome Belly Button Tattoos

Part 7 Part 6


Let the Vietnam War. In 1964, two U.S. destroyers were attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin by North Vietnamese ships. For this reason, it triggered the Vietnam War, which dragged on for nearly 30 years. In 1966, President Lyndon Johnson cut off supplies to the Soviet bloc because he knew that the countries of the ball helped the communist North Vietnam. At the same time Rockefeller funded the foundations of Soviet armaments production. While millions of young volunteers risked death, bankers helped their enemies. In 1985 the war continued to rage the U.S. army had to undergo three rules: He could not chase the Viet Cong army across the border with Laos, he could not attack missile batteries without being sure they were in operation, could not take military action without the consent of senior officers. Of course, the Vietnamese armed to the best advantage of these deficits Army Usa. Il motivo dei finanziamenti ai nemici e la creazione e pubblicazione di queste assurde regole, era quello di non vincere e rendere la guerra un conflitto di logoramento, lunghissimo e costoso. In questo modo i banchieri come Rockefeller e Rothschild si arricchirono ulteriormente. Anni dopo, il segretario alla Difesa statunitense ammise che la causa dello scoppio della guerra, l’incidente del Tonchino, fu un errore e che in realtà non ci fu nessun attacco alle navi della marina americana. Di nuovo “problema-reazione-soluzione” e manipolazione delle menti e delle coscienze degli abitanti del mondo.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Jacksonville Fl Swim Team Hoodies

Alitalia bank and the lies of the regime Part 5

Ieri, 18 Settembre, Colaninno e la cordata italiana Cai (Compagnia aerea italiana) si sono ritirati dall’affare Alitalia. Chi pensava che Silvio avesse risolto la questione c’e’ rimasto molto male. Nulla è cambiato, si ricomincia da capo. L’offerta dell’Air France è ormai soltanto un lontano ricordo.
In molti fanno finta di essersi dimenticati come sono andate veramente le cose.
Nel Marzo 2008, in piena campagna elettorale, la compagnia aerea francese lanciò un’offerta per rilevare la debilitata(e indebitata) Alitalia, ma il futuro presidente del consiglio Silvio Berlusconi, evidentemente desideroso di perdere le elezioni, se ne uscì con delle dichiarazioni destinate a rimanere negli annali: “Penso ci sia la possibilità di concretizzare una cordata italiana in a few days: I am absolutely confident about this and I also believe you can do with the support of major financial institutions. " Unfortunately, the Italian consortium came after several months and we will see in what way it was preparing to buy Alitalia, "The response to Air France will give the next president of the Council and is a clear 'no'." Basically, the future prime minister slammed the door in the face of a company, Air France, which has had to withdraw, for obvious reasons, "Even I would be willing to sacrifice, but now accuse me of having an interest. I could participate like everyone else, and even my children think that they would not say no. " Then there 'who is surprised withdrawal of Air France! The Caiman (or Cain, as he calls Marco Travaglio) blamed the unions, as it did again recently, but the real responsibility is his. In a nation as prime minister, the richest man in that country, it would put across to prevent a foreign company purchases its own airline in ruins? Among other things, announcing imaginary rope teams headed by his son and always denied by the owners.
With each passing day, the Knight has seen fit to grant a bridging loan of 300 million euro from the slot machines named Alitalia. Of course the European Union condemned Berlusconi's astute move because in fact it is a state aid. Why you should spend all that money for Alitalia, while for other companies not? But even this is not important for the Cayman, which granted the loan to the airline, which promptly burned all 300 million euro in a few months.
Then, in June, Berlusconi announced that Italian consortium made up of Aeroflot and Colaninno, forgetting that by sheer bad luck Aeroflot Russian but not Italian. Details. And, icing on the cake, the same Russian company withdrew in the blink of an eye his interest deal. But this is just a detail, the important is to confuse public opinion and give a strong image of himself.
As a result of various bluff occurred sixteen Italian businessmen, led by Roberto Colaninno, meeting in the Italian Airline (Cai). It should, for the record, look at these "saviors" to understand who they are: Roberto Colaninno
is CEO of Mediobanca and Efibanca and was sentenced to four years' imprisonment in the first trial for bankruptcy-Italcase Bagaglino.
Marcellino Gavio instead was arrested in '93 for Tangentopoli and sentenced to six months in jail for violation of secret investigation.
Salvatore Ligresti, not to look bad within the consortium, has submitted fitted sentence to 2 ½ years in prison for bribery.
Carlo Toto has bargained 11 months for giving bribes to two deputies Dc.
Not to mention the group Mercegaglia, who has a criminal record stretching too far so vast that my article.
Well, even evil. We came to talk about the facts of the last hours. Alitalia has been split into two companies: The Bad company, debt-ridden, dilapidated, and Good Company, part of the company that makes profits. In your opinion, the Berlusconi government who has given the company good? Cai the course, while the state (ie us) should be assuming the debts and heavy losses of Bad Company. In the project are also planned layoffs for more than 2,000 employees, but are called "redundancies," a word much more mellifluous and ambiguous, confusing for the people.
Above all, entrepreneurs are Cai (indeed, "would", because the transaction did not go to port), harmless from any liability for any failures. Too easy, so even Mister Bean would be able to run a business if it had civil and criminal liability.
However, responsibility or not, the negotiations for the purchase of Alitalia by Cai never really started, as soon as the CGIL has given his consent to the project, Colaninno & brothers have screwed it up. Yesterday, to be precise. Now we just have to wait for further developments. We just have to wait, or to put it Benigni and Troisi, "we can do is cry."

PS: Regarding the articles on SIGNORAGGIO BANK publish them with a few days apart to give room for other subjects e. .. to make me want to read!

Ps2: Today the European Central Bank (the one in my post so I'm targeting) and the Bank of England, in tow of the Fed, they have placed in the financial market of 80 billion dollars, and now European shares were up 7 -8%. Not happened in years a rising stock market as well. This shows how the ECB has the power of life and death sull'Eurozona. Since it is able to enter all that money when he wants, because it has not done before? As it happens all the major central banks (Fed, Bank of England and Swiss Central Bank) have injected fresh liquidity in the market at the same time and in no time. Surely must mean something ...

Jacksonville Fl Swim Team Hoodies

Alitalia bank and the lies of the regime Part 5

Ieri, 18 Settembre, Colaninno e la cordata italiana Cai (Compagnia aerea italiana) si sono ritirati dall’affare Alitalia. Chi pensava che Silvio avesse risolto la questione c’e’ rimasto molto male. Nulla è cambiato, si ricomincia da capo. L’offerta dell’Air France è ormai soltanto un lontano ricordo.
In molti fanno finta di essersi dimenticati come sono andate veramente le cose.
Nel Marzo 2008, in piena campagna elettorale, la compagnia aerea francese lanciò un’offerta per rilevare la debilitata(e indebitata) Alitalia, ma il futuro presidente del consiglio Silvio Berlusconi, evidentemente desideroso di perdere le elezioni, se ne uscì con delle dichiarazioni destinate a rimanere negli annali: “Penso ci sia la possibilità di concretizzare una cordata italiana in a few days: I am absolutely confident about this and I also believe you can do with the support of major financial institutions. " Unfortunately, the Italian consortium came after several months and we will see in what way it was preparing to buy Alitalia, "The response to Air France will give the next president of the Council and is a clear 'no'." Basically, the future prime minister slammed the door in the face of a company, Air France, which has had to withdraw, for obvious reasons, "Even I would be willing to sacrifice, but now accuse me of having an interest. I could participate like everyone else, and even my children think that they would not say no. " Then there 'who is surprised withdrawal of Air France! The Caiman (or Cain, as he calls Marco Travaglio) blamed the unions, as it did again recently, but the real responsibility is his. In a nation as prime minister, the richest man in that country, it would put across to prevent a foreign company purchases its own airline in ruins? Among other things, announcing imaginary rope teams headed by his son and always denied by the owners.
With each passing day, the Knight has seen fit to grant a bridging loan of 300 million euro from the slot machines named Alitalia. Of course the European Union condemned Berlusconi's astute move because in fact it is a state aid. Why you should spend all that money for Alitalia, while for other companies not? But even this is not important for the Cayman, which granted the loan to the airline, which promptly burned all 300 million euro in a few months.
Then, in June, Berlusconi announced that Italian consortium made up of Aeroflot and Colaninno, forgetting that by sheer bad luck Aeroflot Russian but not Italian. Details. And, icing on the cake, the same Russian company withdrew in the blink of an eye his interest deal. But this is just a detail, the important is to confuse public opinion and give a strong image of himself.
As a result of various bluff occurred sixteen Italian businessmen, led by Roberto Colaninno, meeting in the Italian Airline (Cai). It should, for the record, look at these "saviors" to understand who they are: Roberto Colaninno
is CEO of Mediobanca and Efibanca and was sentenced to four years' imprisonment in the first trial for bankruptcy-Italcase Bagaglino.
Marcellino Gavio instead was arrested in '93 for Tangentopoli and sentenced to six months in jail for violation of secret investigation.
Salvatore Ligresti, not to look bad within the consortium, has submitted fitted sentence to 2 ½ years in prison for bribery.
Carlo Toto has bargained 11 months for giving bribes to two deputies Dc.
Not to mention the group Mercegaglia, who has a criminal record stretching too far so vast that my article.
Well, even evil. We came to talk about the facts of the last hours. Alitalia has been split into two companies: The Bad company, debt-ridden, dilapidated, and Good Company, part of the company that makes profits. In your opinion, the Berlusconi government who has given the company good? Cai the course, while the state (ie us) should be assuming the debts and heavy losses of Bad Company. In the project are also planned layoffs for more than 2,000 employees, but are called "redundancies," a word much more mellifluous and ambiguous, confusing for the people.
Above all, entrepreneurs are Cai (indeed, "would", because the transaction did not go to port), harmless from any liability for any failures. Too easy, so even Mister Bean would be able to run a business if it had civil and criminal liability.
However, responsibility or not, the negotiations for the purchase of Alitalia by Cai never really started, as soon as the CGIL has given his consent to the project, Colaninno & brothers have screwed it up. Yesterday, to be precise. Now we just have to wait for further developments. We just have to wait, or to put it Benigni and Troisi, "we can do is cry."

PS: Regarding the articles on SIGNORAGGIO BANK publish them with a few days apart to give room for other subjects e. .. to make me want to read!

Ps2: Today the European Central Bank (the one in my post so I'm targeting) and the Bank of England, in tow of the Fed, they have placed in the financial market of 80 billion dollars, and now European shares were up 7 -8%. Not happened in years a rising stock market as well. This shows how the ECB has the power of life and death sull'Eurozona. Since it is able to enter all that money when he wants, because it has not done before? As it happens all the major central banks (Fed, Bank of England and Swiss Central Bank) have injected fresh liquidity in the market at the same time and in no time. Surely must mean something ...

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Ball Wart Foot Doctor Podiatrist Dermatologist



if we were to analyze other events of great importance we would realize that the banking system has changed reality, shape it from behind the scenes, unnoticed. This is why many think the state in which we live is not a democracy but a steganocrazia: power pool.
soon after the establishment of the Fed in 1913, broke several wars: World War I, World War II and the Vietnam War.
raged in Europe World War I and Woodrow Wilson declared neutrality in the U.S. openly. But bank interests were too large. As we have said war is the biggest deal that can happen to a central bank, because it forces the nation to borrow money to gigantic proportions. The American Colonel House, linked to the international banking families and one of the founders of the Council on Foreign Reletions, contacted the British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey to find a way to drag the U.S. into war. In a recorded conversation, Grey said, "What would the Americans, the Germans sank an ocean liner with American passengers onboard?" House said, "I believe that a wave of indignation overwhelm the United States, and this would be enough to make us go to war. " Remember what happened May 7, 1915? The cruise ship Lusitania crossed the English Channel, where it was common knowledge the activity of German submarines, and was torpedoed by a submarine. The Americans immediately asked to enter the U.S. in the European conflict. Still the same interests, same people behind the scenes and the same pattern problem-reaction-solution. JD Rockefeller grossed 200 million dollars from the war and the United States spent $ 30 billion, mostly borrowed from the Federal Reserve on interest.
Even World War II was fueled by the banking cartels. The axis
Italy-Germany-Japan expanded like wildfire throughout Europe and Asia. The United States once again declared their neutrality, but the men behind the scenes they wanted to enter the country at war. President Roosevelt, from a banking family from the eighteenth century, cut off oil supplies to Japan and froze the investments of Japan, the UK military aid and loans granted to China, an enemy of Japan. In short, Roosevelt, whose father was a member of the board of the Fed, did his best to annoy the Japanese. Once again came into play the same pattern: it was necessary to convince the public to accept the entry into the war, in order to further the interests of banks. After these provocations, Japan attacked the navy stationed at Pearl Harbor Dec. 7, 1941, killing 2,400 sailors. The U.S. military, despite being warned by the Australian Secret Service to the arrival of ships of Japan, did nothing to prevent the catastrophe. Results: 1 million Americans enlisted for the war and the banking cartel is enriched beyond measure. In Europe, Hitler's Germany was supported by IG Farben, the current Bayer, which produced the gas Zyklon B (the one used to kill Jews in gas chambers) and 84% of German explosives. A company to the IG Farben was the Standard Oil Company of JDRockefeller. Without the additive provided by these banks, the Luftwaffe (German Air Force) could never put into operation. The bombings on London were made possible because of the sale by the Standard Oil Company of approximately $ 20 million of fuel to IG Farben. In addition, the American Union Bank Corporation was devoted to the recycling of money financed the Nazis and Hitler. You know who was the Union Bank? He belonged to Prescott Bush! George's father and grandfather of George Bush W. Bush, a member of the Masonic Skull & Bones, the same which seems to belong to the current U.S. President. The Union Bank was eventually confiscated. The history books do not say that either.

Ball Wart Foot Doctor Podiatrist Dermatologist



if we were to analyze other events of great importance we would realize that the banking system has changed reality, shape it from behind the scenes, unnoticed. This is why many think the state in which we live is not a democracy but a steganocrazia: power pool.
soon after the establishment of the Fed in 1913, broke several wars: World War I, World War II and the Vietnam War.
raged in Europe World War I and Woodrow Wilson declared neutrality in the U.S. openly. But bank interests were too large. As we have said war is the biggest deal that can happen to a central bank, because it forces the nation to borrow money to gigantic proportions. The American Colonel House, linked to the international banking families and one of the founders of the Council on Foreign Reletions, contacted the British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey to find a way to drag the U.S. into war. In a recorded conversation, Grey said, "What would the Americans, the Germans sank an ocean liner with American passengers onboard?" House said, "I believe that a wave of indignation overwhelm the United States, and this would be enough to make us go to war. " Remember what happened May 7, 1915? The cruise ship Lusitania crossed the English Channel, where it was common knowledge the activity of German submarines, and was torpedoed by a submarine. The Americans immediately asked to enter the U.S. in the European conflict. Still the same interests, same people behind the scenes and the same pattern problem-reaction-solution. JD Rockefeller grossed 200 million dollars from the war and the United States spent $ 30 billion, mostly borrowed from the Federal Reserve on interest.
Even World War II was fueled by the banking cartels. The axis
Italy-Germany-Japan expanded like wildfire throughout Europe and Asia. The United States once again declared their neutrality, but the men behind the scenes they wanted to enter the country at war. President Roosevelt, from a banking family from the eighteenth century, cut off oil supplies to Japan and froze the investments of Japan, the UK military aid and loans granted to China, an enemy of Japan. In short, Roosevelt, whose father was a member of the board of the Fed, did his best to annoy the Japanese. Once again came into play the same pattern: it was necessary to convince the public to accept the entry into the war, in order to further the interests of banks. After these provocations, Japan attacked the navy stationed at Pearl Harbor Dec. 7, 1941, killing 2,400 sailors. The U.S. military, despite being warned by the Australian Secret Service to the arrival of ships of Japan, did nothing to prevent the catastrophe. Results: 1 million Americans enlisted for the war and the banking cartel is enriched beyond measure. In Europe, Hitler's Germany was supported by IG Farben, the current Bayer, which produced the gas Zyklon B (the one used to kill Jews in gas chambers) and 84% of German explosives. A company to the IG Farben was the Standard Oil Company of JDRockefeller. Without the additive provided by these banks, the Luftwaffe (German Air Force) could never put into operation. The bombings on London were made possible because of the sale by the Standard Oil Company of approximately $ 20 million of fuel to IG Farben. In addition, the American Union Bank Corporation was devoted to the recycling of money financed the Nazis and Hitler. You know who was the Union Bank? He belonged to Prescott Bush! George's father and grandfather of George Bush W. Bush, a member of the Masonic Skull & Bones, the same which seems to belong to the current U.S. President. The Union Bank was eventually confiscated. The history books do not say that either.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Reebok X Pulse Goalie Pads

bank seigniorage seigniorage seigniorage

Who killed John Kennedy?

President Kennedy, by Executive Order 11110, prevented the Federal Reserve to lend money on interest to the U.S. government. Then he declared that there are occult forces maneuver and make the world a human being subject to these powers. John Kennedy was killed shortly after, November 22, 1963, and the new notes based on the true value of silver which he took, were still replaced the dollar issued by the Fed Opponents dies. The same thing happened to President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated probably for the same reason many years ago.
the history books do not mention much the stock market crash of 1929, let's see why. The famous stock market crash of 1929 was organized by an elite of bankers belonging to the Federal Reserve. Between 1921 and 1929, the Fed greatly increased the money supply in circulation and there was a growth of loans to businesses, individuals and other banks. In addition he introduced the "margin loan", which allows the investor to purchase a title to 10% of the original price, while the remaining 90% was covered by an intermediary, the broker. La truffa era basata sul fatto che il prestito poteva essere ritirato in qualunque momento e doveva essere pagato entro 24 ore. La chiamata a margine addizionale obbligava quasi sempre a vendere i titoli acquistati a credito. Poco prima del 24 Ottobre del 1929, passato alla Storia con il nome di “Giovedì nero”, J.D.Rockefeller e Bernhard Barack si sfilarono dal mercato senza preavviso e così i banchieri “esterni” che avevano concesso prestiti a margine li ritirarono su scala nazionale. Questo innescò una reazione a catena: vendita di titoli per pagare i debiti, prelievi, crollo di 16'000 banche e la possibilità per i cospiratori della Fed di acquistare a prezzi stracciati migliaia di banche rivali fallite. Come se non enough, the Fed increased the money supply but declined, causing more American Great Depression. Then again Louis McFadden said that was all a ploy designed to show the world who were the real masters and decided to oppose the banking cartel to initiating impeachment proceedings against the Council of the Fed, but he died poisoned after having already suffered two attempts murder. The bankers of the Fed, after reducing the American people on their knees, they decided to abolish the gold standard, but it had to mop up all the gold in circulation. Thus, in 1933, under the pretext of the solution to the Great Depression, gave rise to the confiscation of gold under threat of a penalty of 10 years in prison for those who had refused to transfer it to the State Treasury. The Gold Standard was liquidated in the same year and the U.S. dollar was no longer convertible into gold, just read the notes written on pre-1933 "convertible into gold" and the words of now "legal tender" to realize this without examining the details. So the only thing that assigns a value to the dollar, euro and so on, is the amount of money issued by central banks, which control the purchasing power or inflation.

Reebok X Pulse Goalie Pads

bank seigniorage seigniorage seigniorage

Who killed John Kennedy?

President Kennedy, by Executive Order 11110, prevented the Federal Reserve to lend money on interest to the U.S. government. Then he declared that there are occult forces maneuver and make the world a human being subject to these powers. John Kennedy was killed shortly after, November 22, 1963, and the new notes based on the true value of silver which he took, were still replaced the dollar issued by the Fed Opponents dies. The same thing happened to President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated probably for the same reason many years ago.
the history books do not mention much the stock market crash of 1929, let's see why. The famous stock market crash of 1929 was organized by an elite of bankers belonging to the Federal Reserve. Between 1921 and 1929, the Fed greatly increased the money supply in circulation and there was a growth of loans to businesses, individuals and other banks. In addition he introduced the "margin loan", which allows the investor to purchase a title to 10% of the original price, while the remaining 90% was covered by an intermediary, the broker. La truffa era basata sul fatto che il prestito poteva essere ritirato in qualunque momento e doveva essere pagato entro 24 ore. La chiamata a margine addizionale obbligava quasi sempre a vendere i titoli acquistati a credito. Poco prima del 24 Ottobre del 1929, passato alla Storia con il nome di “Giovedì nero”, J.D.Rockefeller e Bernhard Barack si sfilarono dal mercato senza preavviso e così i banchieri “esterni” che avevano concesso prestiti a margine li ritirarono su scala nazionale. Questo innescò una reazione a catena: vendita di titoli per pagare i debiti, prelievi, crollo di 16'000 banche e la possibilità per i cospiratori della Fed di acquistare a prezzi stracciati migliaia di banche rivali fallite. Come se non enough, the Fed increased the money supply but declined, causing more American Great Depression. Then again Louis McFadden said that was all a ploy designed to show the world who were the real masters and decided to oppose the banking cartel to initiating impeachment proceedings against the Council of the Fed, but he died poisoned after having already suffered two attempts murder. The bankers of the Fed, after reducing the American people on their knees, they decided to abolish the gold standard, but it had to mop up all the gold in circulation. Thus, in 1933, under the pretext of the solution to the Great Depression, gave rise to the confiscation of gold under threat of a penalty of 10 years in prison for those who had refused to transfer it to the State Treasury. The Gold Standard was liquidated in the same year and the U.S. dollar was no longer convertible into gold, just read the notes written on pre-1933 "convertible into gold" and the words of now "legal tender" to realize this without examining the details. So the only thing that assigns a value to the dollar, euro and so on, is the amount of money issued by central banks, which control the purchasing power or inflation.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Swollen Tingly Ankles

bank transfer part 4 part 3

But we come to the history books, many events that have marked the progress of humanity have been altered by power from the banking system and some events that we find in our books are probably false or partially true. Do not believe us?
1775, American Revolutionary War is raging. In the books it says that the underlying causes of conflict were the excessive duties imposed on the colonists from England, the Stamp Act, the inability to sell surplus goods and the excessive power of the East India Company's tea trade.
But the real reason lies elsewhere. The colonies were forced to borrow money by the Central Bank of England and this made them sink into debt, and then in slavery. One of the founding fathers of the American Constitution, Benjamin Franklin, said che “Il rifiuto di Re Giorgio III di concedere alle colonie un sistema monetario virtuoso, in grado di liberare la gente dalla morsa dei manipolatori del denaro, fu probabilmente la causa principale della Rivoluzione”.
Agli inizi del ‘900 le famiglie bancarie più importanti erano i Rockefeller, i Morgan, i Warburg e i Rothschild, secondo il giornalista David Icke appartenenti alla cosiddetta loggia degli Illuminati, nuclei familiari che sfruttano il proprio potere per creare un nuovo ordine globale e lo Stato Unico mondiale. Queste famiglie intendevano premere sul Congresso per la creazione di una legge che istituisse una nuova Banca Centrale. Sapevano perfettamente che la gente non avrebbe accettato una cosa simile…in condizioni normali. So they decided to achieve this through the use of the key problem-reaction-solution, widely used even today by governments, and it works like this: 1) it creates a problem of enormous magnitude, 2) the people were afraid, becomes vulnerable and calls for action by the Authority, accept any compromise, and 3) finally the solution is proposed, that is its target even before the crisis, on the other desk study. JP Morgan, one of the largest financiers of the time, in 1907, he circulated the rumor that a major bank was on the verge of bankruptcy. This led to collective hysteria, people rushed to withdraw for fear of losing their savings and banks were forced to retract loans to companies and individuals, causing a series of bankruptcies and seizures of property. The U.S. congressman Nelson Aldrich, very close to representatives of the banking cartel and belonging to the Rockefeller family, was put in charge of an investigation of the facts. Its committee of inquiry led to the solution: the establishment of a new Central Bank. The very purpose of the conspirators. Then, in 1910, JP Morgan hosted at his villa on the island of Jekyll a secret meeting with the various international bankers to write the Federal Reserve Act, the law on the creation of the Central Bank of the U.S. Federal The Federal Reserve Act was passed to the representative of the banking families in Congress, Nelson Aldrich, who had approved in 1913 under President Woodrow Wilson. The President himself, several years later, he wrote one of the most important American newspapers that: "Our great industrial nation has fallen from its banking system. Our banking system is concentrated in private hands. The growth and activities of the nation is in the hands of a few men who, by force of circumstances, because of its limits, brake, control, destroy, the genuine economic freedom. We have become one of the worst governments, one of the most controlled and dominated among those of the civilized world. No longer a government founded on freedom of opinion, no longer a government of the ideals and the vote of a majority, but a government based on opinion and duress of small dominant groups. " Congressman Louis McFadden said that the Federal Reserve Act was created a "super-state" controlled by international bankers.
Ps: the short fourth part public also

a comment that I posted on this very illuminating article by my friend V:

"I can well believe that these cose.Tradotto not say in plain words: We are slaves of the bankers international, our taxes are used to pay a debt but above unquenchable falso.Con the great scam of creating money from nothing bankers borrow nations and then take away all their patrimonio.Noi work 8 hours a day, we struggle to make ends meet to pay a debt that is in a waste paper ............ taking the piss colossale.Tutti politicians then in putting down the banker let die of hunger if not to live in hardship popoli.Viviamo entire period in which goods are abundant but there is no money to buy them ..... why not print them !!!!!!!!!!!!! If you print them become debt and then raise taxes ......... I can well believe that they do not understand when people talk about this I hope will make the revolution ...... But I am afraid that most people accept both slave and his condizione.Io can not do that, I I'm not a slave, so in my little I closed my account and I circulate more notes as possible (do not use debit card or credit card) must be printed and at least a minimal expense remained, if we use your debit card rather than not have spent the banker could also benefit the fractional reserve mechanism that is even worse .............. Seigniorage and Holocaust revisionism are the most taboo subjects in absolute ..... .. "

Swollen Tingly Ankles

bank transfer part 4 part 3

But we come to the history books, many events that have marked the progress of humanity have been altered by power from the banking system and some events that we find in our books are probably false or partially true. Do not believe us?
1775, American Revolutionary War is raging. In the books it says that the underlying causes of conflict were the excessive duties imposed on the colonists from England, the Stamp Act, the inability to sell surplus goods and the excessive power of the East India Company's tea trade.
But the real reason lies elsewhere. The colonies were forced to borrow money by the Central Bank of England and this made them sink into debt, and then in slavery. One of the founding fathers of the American Constitution, Benjamin Franklin, said che “Il rifiuto di Re Giorgio III di concedere alle colonie un sistema monetario virtuoso, in grado di liberare la gente dalla morsa dei manipolatori del denaro, fu probabilmente la causa principale della Rivoluzione”.
Agli inizi del ‘900 le famiglie bancarie più importanti erano i Rockefeller, i Morgan, i Warburg e i Rothschild, secondo il giornalista David Icke appartenenti alla cosiddetta loggia degli Illuminati, nuclei familiari che sfruttano il proprio potere per creare un nuovo ordine globale e lo Stato Unico mondiale. Queste famiglie intendevano premere sul Congresso per la creazione di una legge che istituisse una nuova Banca Centrale. Sapevano perfettamente che la gente non avrebbe accettato una cosa simile…in condizioni normali. So they decided to achieve this through the use of the key problem-reaction-solution, widely used even today by governments, and it works like this: 1) it creates a problem of enormous magnitude, 2) the people were afraid, becomes vulnerable and calls for action by the Authority, accept any compromise, and 3) finally the solution is proposed, that is its target even before the crisis, on the other desk study. JP Morgan, one of the largest financiers of the time, in 1907, he circulated the rumor that a major bank was on the verge of bankruptcy. This led to collective hysteria, people rushed to withdraw for fear of losing their savings and banks were forced to retract loans to companies and individuals, causing a series of bankruptcies and seizures of property. The U.S. congressman Nelson Aldrich, very close to representatives of the banking cartel and belonging to the Rockefeller family, was put in charge of an investigation of the facts. Its committee of inquiry led to the solution: the establishment of a new Central Bank. The very purpose of the conspirators. Then, in 1910, JP Morgan hosted at his villa on the island of Jekyll a secret meeting with the various international bankers to write the Federal Reserve Act, the law on the creation of the Central Bank of the U.S. Federal The Federal Reserve Act was passed to the representative of the banking families in Congress, Nelson Aldrich, who had approved in 1913 under President Woodrow Wilson. The President himself, several years later, he wrote one of the most important American newspapers that: "Our great industrial nation has fallen from its banking system. Our banking system is concentrated in private hands. The growth and activities of the nation is in the hands of a few men who, by force of circumstances, because of its limits, brake, control, destroy, the genuine economic freedom. We have become one of the worst governments, one of the most controlled and dominated among those of the civilized world. No longer a government founded on freedom of opinion, no longer a government of the ideals and the vote of a majority, but a government based on opinion and duress of small dominant groups. " Congressman Louis McFadden said that the Federal Reserve Act was created a "super-state" controlled by international bankers.
Ps: the short fourth part public also

a comment that I posted on this very illuminating article by my friend V:

"I can well believe that these cose.Tradotto not say in plain words: We are slaves of the bankers international, our taxes are used to pay a debt but above unquenchable falso.Con the great scam of creating money from nothing bankers borrow nations and then take away all their patrimonio.Noi work 8 hours a day, we struggle to make ends meet to pay a debt that is in a waste paper ............ taking the piss colossale.Tutti politicians then in putting down the banker let die of hunger if not to live in hardship popoli.Viviamo entire period in which goods are abundant but there is no money to buy them ..... why not print them !!!!!!!!!!!!! If you print them become debt and then raise taxes ......... I can well believe that they do not understand when people talk about this I hope will make the revolution ...... But I am afraid that most people accept both slave and his condizione.Io can not do that, I I'm not a slave, so in my little I closed my account and I circulate more notes as possible (do not use debit card or credit card) must be printed and at least a minimal expense remained, if we use your debit card rather than not have spent the banker could also benefit the fractional reserve mechanism that is even worse .............. Seigniorage and Holocaust revisionism are the most taboo subjects in absolute ..... .. "