For those who still believe that the media can not influence people's minds, expose below a small example: How come when someone says that the founder of a party to the case (Forza Italy) was sentenced in first instance for collusion with the Mafia, people do not make a turn, and when he is told a guy who smokes pipes are shocked and organize debates on the spot? I saw grown men and women, even high school teachers, remain impassive while we talk about bank seigniorage or convicted mafia Giulio Andreotti (who naturally believed acquitted). And I've seen them get angry and bring the collections to save stray dogs on the highway. For goodness sake, there 'nothing wrong if someone agrees to take care of "our four-legged friends" (as they called Open Studio), but if this gesture is not accompanied by an interest in the human race is likely to appear selfish. The dogs and the victims of the Thyssen Krupp no. Why? It is now a real degeneration and this degeneration can be found in the responses to our questions give the degenerate. I experienced first hand an example: (degenerate is the first teacher of letters, the second is a student)
degenerated: "Yesterday I saw a news service to the [Open Studio bet!, Author's note] was talking about a dog who needs an operation on her leg. How about doing a collection together? "
I:" But how? A few weeks ago there was need to pay 1 euro per person to complete the construction of a school in Rwanda and did not say anything, but now organized a collection for a dog? "
degenerate" You have to learn that sometimes the dogs are much better for people "degenerate
classmate:" How heavy! "Heavy
I? If weight only 68 pounds! Jokes aside, the answer given by the teacher is really horrible, at first I had noticed the seriousness of his statement but now I realize that I should go into hiding. What the hell happened? How can you say such things? Why we hate and we prefer to help the puppies rather than the malnourished children in the Third World? Mystery. I leave to you the thoughts and reflections ... Joke! Obviously I do. It gives more importance to animals injured victims in the workplace and the injured in Iraq perché i mezzi di comunicazione, tv in testa, danno più risalto alle storie dei cani abbandonati piuttosto che alle sventure dei clandestini e delle persone che hanno perso la famiglia a causa dei bombardamenti. I tg amano parlare della nascita di un cucciolo di panda in uno zoo e scansano, con grande abilità bisogna ammettere, gli argomenti scomodi. Scomodi per chi? Per i padroni dell’informazione: Il governo e i partiti, la confindustria, le banche. Adesso Berlusconi controlla Mediaset, che è di sua di proprietà, la Rai dato che il consiglio di amministrazione è eletto dal Parlamento, e 20 giornali (Panorama, Il Giornale, Il Foglio..). Perciò possiede il 95% dei mezzi di comunicazione italiani. Di cosa volete who speak their news? Mafia? Of convicts in Parliament? Accident at work? Uncertainty of the penalty? And of all the other problems of the country? No, facial tissues, gossip, murder ... and dogs. It only talks about things that are not uncomfortable against the power, and emotional issues are among these. That's why the news, and consequently the majority of Italians (shaped as desired by the mass media), are sensitive to gossip, to the crime and to the dogs, and ignore, for various reasons, the arguments that have real impact on our lives. Now no longer need to lie, they talk about dogs and they all forget we are in that situation. The dogs, in spite of themselves, have become a kind of "watchdogs" in the service of power, have climbed even journalists. If there are other, lies, scandals and shame disappear from the TV screen as if by magic.
If things remain this way the truth will remain hidden saeculorum saecula. Amen.
The Illuminati